6 'II?lII IIIIIIII v.
Taylor, Archaeologia, lii., " On the Use of the Terms Crosier, Pastoral Staff and Cross ").
Lii.) that the substitution, z =?
Wien, lii., 1902).
Lii., 1891; A.
If we write l~ = h1 + K/lii, If = hf + K1/hf, we find, on elimination of K,
And lii., are still regarded in their present form as non-Jeremianic. The question which next awaits decision is whether any part of the booklet on foreign nations (xxv., xlvi.-li.) can safely be regarded as Jeremianic. Giesebrecht still asserts theenuineness of xxv.
I); (b) xxvi.-xxix., passages from Baruch's biography of Jeremiah; (c) xxx.-xxxi., the book of the future of Israel and Judah; (d) xxxii.-xlv., from Baruch; (e) xlvi.-li., the prophecies " concerning the nations"; i (f) lii., historical appendix.